page 80, 2.3.5 > presheaf OX-modules -> presheaf of OX-modules page 122 Figure 3.8. (description) > [(x-2y-4)] -> [(x-2,y-4)] page 123 > the general point of K satisfies such-and-such a property... -> "the general point of X satisfies.... > (25.3, for example) -> (25.3), for example page 131 >restricts to the desired element a_z of A_f_z -> restricts to the desired element a_z/(f_z)^(l_z) of A_f_z page 133 > incidence-reversing -> inclusion-reversing page 223 > S[N-deg g[1]](+)S[N-deg g[2]]{...S[N] -> g[1] S[N-deg g[1]](+)g2 S[N-deg g[w]]{...S[N] page 311 11.2.9. > pure dimensional k scheme -> pure dimensional k-scheme page 316 11.3.3 [assume f is not invertible?] page 323 11.4.1 > empty set has dimension m-n why? page 369 > smaller than the full category of O-module -> smaller than the full category of O_X-module page 452 17.2.G > S.'=(+)_{n=0}(S_n(x)L^(x)n) -> S.'=(+)_{n>=0}(S_n(x)L^(x)n) page 452 17.2.3 > PF = P(L(x)F) -> PF = P(L(x)F) for invertible sheaf L page 468 18.1.6 > As a partial converse converse of which statement? * "quasicoherent sheaf of graded algebra" is not defined?